劍橋雅思C11T1P2閱讀 劍橋雅思17和12難度對(duì)比相關(guān)內(nèi)容,小編在這里做了整理,希望能對(duì)大家有所幫助,關(guān)于劍橋雅思C11T1P2閱讀 劍橋雅思17和12難度對(duì)比信息,一起來(lái)了解一下吧!
本文目錄一覽:
劍橋雅思閱讀
因?yàn)閯蛳盗幸恢笔强脊俸脱潘伎忌臉蛄?,也注定?huì)是雅思考試的風(fēng)向標(biāo),劍九的出版,豐富了考生的備考資料。
那么,《劍九》中傳遞了哪樣的信息,延續(xù)了劍橋家族中哪些不變,又呈現(xiàn)了哪些變化,以及劍九對(duì)現(xiàn)在的雅思考試究竟有哪些指導(dǎo)意義?該如何有效而高效的利用起這本真題集,來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)內(nèi)功與考試高分雙增長(zhǎng)的目標(biāo)?
延續(xù)閱讀經(jīng)典題型
之前學(xué)生中道聽(tīng)途說(shuō)有很多猜忌,說(shuō)在留學(xué)大潮的當(dāng)下,雅思考試為了選拔人才,會(huì)在2013年有所變革。
縱觀《劍九》中收錄的四套高水準(zhǔn)的劍橋真題,各位考生大可不必慌張,雅思考試在今年,乃至可預(yù)見(jiàn)的2014年,這兩年題型上應(yīng)該不會(huì)有新題型出現(xiàn),依然會(huì)延續(xù)劍橋家族中的經(jīng)典題型。
雅思官網(wǎng)上把閱讀部分題型分成十種,總體上分為五種大題型,和五種小題型。
前者分別是LIST OF HEADINGS 選段意題;MATCHING搭配題;TRUE,F(xiàn)ALSE,NOT GIVEN OR YES,NO,NOT GIVEN判斷題,MULTIPLE CHOICE選擇題 和SUMMARY填空題。
那么五種小題型大部分是大題型SUMMARY的延續(xù),比如填圖表,填流程,看圖填詞,句子填空,和簡(jiǎn)答題。
大題型不能存在僥幸心里,五個(gè)題型都應(yīng)該將解題思路爛熟于心,以在考場(chǎng)上迅速切換思路,爭(zhēng)取速度,力求準(zhǔn)確。
《劍九》文章收錄最新
《劍四》、《劍五》中的文章主要集中在2001-2003這三年;《劍六》主要來(lái)自2004-2005年,《劍七》多數(shù)是2006年和2007年這兩年,于是《劍八》中收錄的文章,主要是考場(chǎng)上2008年考過(guò)的文章,部分來(lái)自2007年,個(gè)別來(lái)自2009年,這次《劍九》中收錄的文章,比對(duì)了以往的考題,主要來(lái)自2009年,個(gè)別來(lái)自2011年和2012年。
其中有兩篇文章在考場(chǎng)上考察了不下四次,這次也光榮退休到《劍九》的真題集中:IS THERE ANYBODY OUT THERE? (《搜索外星生物》 來(lái)自2002年,2004年6月26日,2007年1月20日,2009年12月19日),和另外一篇 Venus in transit 《金星凌日》來(lái)自2007年5月19日,2008年6月21日,2009年2月28日和2012年4月28日)這就印證了我們一貫的猜測(cè),考場(chǎng)上依然有很多舊題在用,有的甚至能用到4次才退休。
所以我們點(diǎn)題班上為學(xué)員整理的內(nèi)容,還是十分有用的。雖然劍九中收錄的文章較以往劍橋系列已經(jīng)為最新的了(多為2009年),但是很多不了解雅思出題動(dòng)態(tài)的同學(xué)依然不滿足,期待能多出現(xiàn)2012年或2011年的題目。
其實(shí)這是并無(wú)意義的,在雅思考試中,文章文本只是依托,我們的任務(wù)是做題得分。
結(jié)合了2012年全年47場(chǎng)考試141篇閱讀文章,我們還是能夠洞察出這次劍橋大學(xué)考試委員會(huì)在編篡劍九的時(shí)候還是用了心思的,他們側(cè)重了題型的分配,對(duì)現(xiàn)在備考有很大的指導(dǎo)作用。
透露題型考察重點(diǎn)
就大題型而言List of headings 題目數(shù)量驟降,與2012年全年的7%數(shù)字吻合,體現(xiàn)驟降。
Matching題普遍上升,與2012年全年25%的數(shù)字,即每次考試近乎10道搭配題,數(shù)量一致,其中人名配理論為普通搭配型的重中之重,《劍九》中一共有兩道大題是普通型的搭配,通通都是人名配理論。
另外搭配題中的段落配相關(guān)信息型飆升(即如下幾個(gè)信息在原文中哪個(gè)自然段有所提及型),請(qǐng)廣大考生注意備考側(cè)重。
其它的題型,判斷題仍然占有絕對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì),Multiple choice 單多選題, 并無(wú)出眾表現(xiàn)。SUMMARY 從數(shù)量上較以往劍橋系列有所下降,但是結(jié)合了它繁衍成的小題型來(lái)看一點(diǎn)都不少。
那么小題型中,《劍九》中雖沒(méi)有出現(xiàn)表格題,但這對(duì)我們絲毫沒(méi)有影響,因?yàn)楸砀耦}直接套用填空題的方法即可。
不過(guò)有意思的是,簡(jiǎn)答題象一匹黑馬沖了出來(lái),其它的劍橋系列都沒(méi)怎么出題的簡(jiǎn)答題,在《劍九》中大量出現(xiàn),有兩點(diǎn)發(fā)現(xiàn):
第一,完善了劍橋系列的閱讀題型,針對(duì)簡(jiǎn)答題讓考生有題可練,有題能練,而且能夠通過(guò)劍九練透。
第二,讓考生意識(shí)到,稍微方法不同與SUMMARY的小題型考察數(shù)量在增加,除了簡(jiǎn)答,完成句子中類似普通MATCHING題的比重也有所增加。
這個(gè)趨勢(shì)已經(jīng)從2013年的頭幾個(gè)月考試中能夠顯露出來(lái)。
如何高效利用《劍九》?
考前兩周當(dāng)真題沖刺用,結(jié)合聽(tīng)力部分,完全利用《劍九》當(dāng)模擬題來(lái)考察自己的能力。
建議??紩r(shí)間設(shè)定在周一和周三,周二和周四進(jìn)行分析,周五查漏補(bǔ)缺,周六親臨考場(chǎng)。
做題順序建議:按順序即可:Test1- Test2-Test3-Test4 等級(jí)為: 中——難——難——中。解釋一下,第一套用中等水平題目驗(yàn)證一下自己復(fù)習(xí)的是否充分有效,如果不如預(yù)期,停下來(lái)分析劍橋6,7,8做過(guò)的題目。
分析好了以后再回來(lái)操作劍九第二套,而后第三套,經(jīng)歷了難度遞增之后,最后臨考前加強(qiáng)信心,做第四套。
每每做完套題都不要立刻對(duì)答案,這樣就不可避免的會(huì)對(duì)著答案往文章里去思考,從而不能達(dá)到能力的提高。
應(yīng)該采取三步走,第一步,先嚴(yán)格計(jì)時(shí)做,第二步再可放松時(shí)間延時(shí)做,最后第三步翻著字典做。
三遍都經(jīng)歷之后,才可核對(duì)答案,記錄下三次的答案是否有出入,找到自己的不足。
延時(shí)后能多對(duì)幾個(gè)的,說(shuō)明語(yǔ)言還不錯(cuò),可能方法上有漏洞,以至于一卡時(shí)間,語(yǔ)言就發(fā)揮不出來(lái)了。
查字典后能多對(duì)上幾個(gè)的,說(shuō)明內(nèi)功不足,這樣短時(shí)間大體上就可以找到自己的問(wèn)題。
然后需要靜下心來(lái),認(rèn)真分析。錯(cuò)題對(duì)題都需要回原文,定位分析,推敲答案。
詳情,201303/11/3909.html查看。
請(qǐng)問(wèn)2023年2月23日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案
您好,我是專注留學(xué)考試規(guī)劃和留學(xué)咨詢的小鐘老師。選擇留學(xué)是人生重要的決策之一,而作為您的指導(dǎo),我非常高興能為您提供最準(zhǔn)確的留學(xué)解答和規(guī)劃。無(wú)論您的問(wèn)題是關(guān)于考試準(zhǔn)備、專業(yè)選擇、申請(qǐng)流程還是學(xué)校信息,我都在這里為您解答。更多留學(xué)資訊和學(xué)校招生介紹,歡迎隨時(shí)訪問(wèn)。
前兩天最新一期的雅思考試圓滿結(jié)束了,真題及答案也已經(jīng)新鮮出爐,想必大家都非常感興趣吧。來(lái)和小鐘老師看一看2023年2月23日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案。
Passage 1
文章題材:說(shuō)明文(人文歷史)
文章題目:絲綢之路
文章難度:★★
文章內(nèi)容:暫無(wú)
題型及數(shù)量:7填空題+6判斷題
題目及答案:
1、robe
2、taxes
3、gold
4、待補(bǔ)充
5、foreign
6、thread
7、待補(bǔ)充
8、T
9、NG
10、F
11、NG
12、T
13、F
可參考真題:C11T3P1:The Story of Silk
Passage 2
文章題材:說(shuō)明文(自然動(dòng)植物)
文章題目:猛犸象
文章難度:★★★★
文章內(nèi)容:文章介紹了猛犸象及其滅絕的原因猜想。
題型及數(shù)量:7填空+6匹配
題目及答案:
14. hunting
15. overkill model
16. disease/hyperdisease
17. empirical evidence
18. climatic instability
19. geographical
20. younger Dryas event
21. A
22. B
23. A
24. B
25. B
26. C
可參考真題:C9T1P3:The History of the Tortoise
考試原文:
Mammoth Kill
Mammoth is any species of the extinct genus Mammuthus, proboscideans commonly equipped with long, curved tusks and in northern species, a covering of long hair. They lived from the Ptiocene epoch from around 5 million years ago, into the Hotocene at about 4,500 years ago, and were members of the family Elephantidae, which contains, along with mammoths, the two genera of modern elephants and their ancestors.
A Like their modern relatives, mammoths were quite large. The largest known species reached heights in the region of 4m at the shoulder and weights up t0 8 tonnes, while exceptionally large males may have exceeded 12 tonnes. However, most species of mammoth were only about as large as a modern Asian elephant. Both sexes bore tusks. A first, *all set appeared at about the age of six months and these were replaced at about 18 months by the permanent set. Growth of the permanent set was at a rate of about l t0 6 inches per year. Based on studies of their close relatives, the modem elephants, mammoths probably had a gestation period of 22 months, resulting in a single calf being born. Their social structure was probably the same as that of African and Asian elephants, with females living in herds headed by a matriarch, whilst hulls lived solitary lives or formed loose groups after sexual maturity.
B MEXICO CITY-Although it’s hard to imagine in this age of urban sprawl and automobiles, North America once belonged to mammoths, camels, ground sloths as large as cows, bear-size beavers and other formidable beasts. Some 11,000 years ago, however, these large bodied mammals and others-about 70 species in all-disappeared. Their demise coincided roughly with the arrival of humans in the New World and dramatic climatic change-factors that have inspired several theories about the die-off. Yet despite decades of scientific investigation, the exact cause remains a mystery. Now new findings offer support to one of these controversial hypotheses: that human hunting drove this megafaunal menagerie ( 巨型動(dòng)物獸群)to extinction. The overkill model emerged in the 1960s, when it was put forth by Paul S. Martin of the University of Arizona. Since then, critics have charged that no evidence exists to support the idea that the first Americans hunted to the extent necessary to cause these extinctions. But at the annual meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology in Mexico City last October, paleoecologist John Alroy of the University of California at Santa Barbara argued that, in fact, hunting-driven extinction is not only plausible, it was unavoidable. He has determined, using a computer simulation that even a very modest amount of hunting would have wiped these animals out.
C Assuming an initial human population of 100 people that grew no more than 2 percent annually, Alroy determined that if each band of, say, 50 people killed 15 to 20 large mammals a year, humans could have eliminated the animal populations within 1,000 years. Large mammals in particular would have been vulnerable to the pressure because they have longer gestation periods than *aller mammals and their young require extended care.
D Not everyone agrees with Alroy’s asses*ent. For one, the results depend in part on population-size estimates for the extinct animals-figures that are not necessarily reliable. But a more specific critici* comes from mammalogist Ross D. E. MacPhee of the American Museum of Natural History in New York City, who points out that the relevant archaeological record contains barely a dozen examples of stone points embedded in mammoth bones (and none, it should be noted, are known from other megafaunal remains)-hardly what one might expect if hunting drove these animals to extinction. Furthermore, some of these species had huge rangesthe giant Jefferson’s ground sloth, for example, lived as far north as the Yukon and as far south as Mexicowhich would have made slaughtering them in numbers sufficient to cause their extinction rather implausible, he says.
E MacPhee agrees that humans most likely brought about these extinctions (as well as others around the world that coincided with human arrival), but not directly. Rather he suggests that people may have introduced hyperlethal disease, perhaps through their dogs or hitchhiking vermin, which then spread wildly among the immunologically naive species of the New World. As in the overkill model, populations of large mammals would have a harder time recovering. Repeated outbreaks of a hyperdisease could thus quickly drive them to the point of no return. So far MacPhee does not have empirical evidence for the hyperdisease hypothesis, and it won’t be easy to come by: hyperlethal disease would kill far too quickly to leave its signature on the bones themselves. But he hopes that *yses of tissue and DNA from the last mammoths to perish will eventually reveal murderous microbes.
F The third explanation for what brought on this North American extinction does not involve human beings. Instead, its proponents blame the loss on the weather. The Pleistocene epoch witnessed considerable climatic instability, explains paleontologist Russell W. Graham of the Denver Museum of Nature and Science. As a result, certain habitats disappeared, and species that had once formed communities split apart. For some animals, this change brought opportunity. For much of the megafauna, however, the increasingly homogeneous environment left them with shrinking geographical ranges-a death sentence for large animals, which need large ranges. Although these creatures managed to maintain viable populations through most of the Pleistocene, the final major fluctuation-the so-called Younger Dryas eventpushed them over the edge, Graham says. For his part, Alroy is convinced that human hunters demolished the titans of the Ice Age. The overkill model explains everything the disease and climate scenarios explain, he asserts, and makes accurate predictions about which species would eventually go extinct. “Personally, I’m a vegetarian,” he remarks, “and I find all of this kind of gross-but believable.”
Passage 3
文章題材:說(shuō)明文(人文研究)
文章題目:大師是怎樣煉成的
文章難度:★★★
文章內(nèi)容:待補(bǔ)充
題型及數(shù)量:4選擇+6判斷+4填空
題目及答案:
27、C
28、C
29、A
30、A
31、NG
32、T
33、NG
34、NG
35、F
36、待補(bǔ)充
37、tuition
38、eight
39、four
40、inherited
可參考真題:C10T2P2:Gifted Children and Learning
以上信息希望能幫助您在留學(xué)申請(qǐng)的道路上少走彎路。如果您還有更多問(wèn)題或需要深入探討,不要猶豫,您可以在我們的留學(xué)官方網(wǎng)站上找到更豐富的考試資訊、留學(xué)指導(dǎo)和*專家咨詢服務(wù)。我們的團(tuán)隊(duì)始終站在您的角度,為您的留學(xué)夢(mèng)想全力以赴。祝您申請(qǐng)順利!
劍橋雅思17和12難度對(duì)比
劍橋雅思17更難。
干擾信息比較多,對(duì)學(xué)生的閱讀理解能力的考察提高多選題中出現(xiàn)很多同義替換,需要在做題時(shí)認(rèn)真分析有學(xué)生反映聽(tīng)力很難做,需要聽(tīng)兩遍才行。相比以往難度稍有提升。
雅思劍橋系列是劍橋大學(xué)考試委員會(huì)外語(yǔ)考試部的雅思考試唯一官方指南,也是各位考生備考過(guò)程中必不可少的的參考書(shū)。里面收錄的題目都是歷年考場(chǎng)上出現(xiàn)過(guò)的題目,具有權(quán)威性。接下來(lái)為大家整理一下,劍17的題型,難度,詞匯,場(chǎng)景,變化。
以上就是劍橋雅思C11T1P2閱讀 劍橋雅思17和12難度對(duì)比全部?jī)?nèi)容了,了解更多相關(guān)信息,關(guān)注大學(xué)路。